**Article:**
In a detailed civil complaint filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Anthony R. Calascione accuses Rutgers University Law School and several associated individuals of orchestrating a conspiracy that violated his due process rights during domestic violence proceedings. The case stems from a Final Restraining Order (FRO) issued against Calascione in 2023, which he claims was the result of judicial bias and procedural misconduct involving Rutgers Law’s Domestic Violence Clinic. The complaint alleges that the clinic’s involvement was part of a covert effort to protect prior judicial rulings by Judge Teresa Kondrup-Coyle, who had affiliations with Rutgers.
Calascione argues that new allegations were secretly added to his case without proper service, creating an unfair trial environment. He also accuses Rutgers Law and its affiliates of manipulating evidence and engaging in improper communications with judges involved in his case. The complaint seeks compensatory and punitive damages, as well as injunctive relief to prevent future involvement by Rutgers Law in similar cases.
Source: 325cv16938_Calascione_v_Rutgers_University_Law_School_Complaint_District_New_Jersey.pdf
